What is happening in Davao City can make for an excellent case study illustrating the "bystander effect." The statistics of those killed by the vigilante group Davao Death Squad (DDS) is steadily rising. According to
Fr. Amado Picardal, CSsR, spokesman of Coalition Against Summary Executions (Case), "For over 10 years, the number of victims of the so-called Davao Death Squad has reached 890 (from 1998 to March 2009)."
Perhaps in other places, this is more than enough to ring the alarm. But not in Davao City---an "oasis of tranquility," as the legendary journalist Max Soliven once described it, amidst the raging conflicts that have plagued most of its neighbors. So far, the rise of death incidence primarily attributed to the Dds has not incited an uproar from the public. And it can even be said that it won't, for as long as there is peace and order---the variety peddled by Mayor Rodrigo Duterte.
More than two decades ago, while in Davao doing a report on the carnage waged by the vigilante group Alsa Masa, Sheila Coronel made an acute observation on the public's response towards the killings. "Often in Davao," Coronel wrote, "when one asks why certain things are allowed to happen, the queries are shrugged off with a curt "You don't live here, you don't know what it is like."" As Davao City is once again enthralled by a vigilante group, this time by the DDS, perhaps the same observation can be made.
How come that, except for a small fraction of human rights activists and civil society groups, not a sizeable majority is protesting against the killings? Indeed, the general mood is one of acceptance, or as others would put it, a tacit approval. How can this be explained?